Penumbra Online

Table of Contents
Album Reviews
The Tortured Poets Department
Snipe Hunter
Book Reviews
Insatiable: My Hunger for Life
Periodic Boyfriends
The Israeli
Movie Reviews
Sinners
Superman
Television Reviews
The Fall of the House of Usher
The Sympathizer
Album Reviews


The Tortured Poets Department and The Tortured Poets Department: The Anthology
by Taylor Swift, 2024
This past spring has brought treasure troves of musical growth with it. From Beyoncé’s excursions into the country genre to Sabrina Carpenter’s emergence as a pop music trailblazer, this has been a prolific era for music. One artist in particular has been at the forefront of shaping the music industry this year: Taylor Swift. In a characteristically monumental fashion, the Eras Tour showrunner came out with not one, but two new albums in April! Entitled The Tortured Poets Department and The Tortured Poets Department: The Anthology, respectively, this latest album release and its 2 A.M. deluxe edition have pervaded the music charts.
Now, where to begin? I’m going to bring my bias into this review and begin with a Top 20 ranking of my own favorite songs from TTPD, including the Anthology additions.
-
So Long, London
-
Fortnight (ft. Post Malone)
-
The Albatross
-
The Prophecy
-
Peter
-
I Can Do It With A Broken Heart
-
The Bolter
-
How Did It End?
-
I Hate It Here
-
Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me?
-
The Black Dog
-
My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys
-
Guilty As Sin
-
The Tortured Poets Department
-
I Look In People’s Windows
-
Fresh Out the Slammer
-
The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived
-
But Daddy I Love Him
-
Down Bad
-
The Manuscript
Although some criticize the heavy hand of Jack Antonoff’s synth-pop productions in the background of Swift’s latest album along with her Midnights album, there is an inherent catchiness that should be attributed to Antonoff’s collaborations. The background music that bears Antonoff’s signature has a rather cinematic effect on the listener. From the sweeping bass notes of “Fortnight” (which also blends in some of Post Malone’s musical traits) to the unsettling cheerfulness of “I Can Do It With a Broken Heart” in opposition to its lyrics, the songwriting of Antonoff and Swift makes for addictive listening.
Where Swift and Antonoff shape a cinematic music experience, Swift and Aaron Dessner craft music akin to an artistic masterpiece. Lovers of folklore and evermore were far from disappointed by the five tracks co-written with Dessner, one being “So Long, London.” A truly heartbreaking mix of lyrics and echoing production, the farewell song reaches into the very heart of such emotions as heartbreak and grief with lines such as “You sacrificed us to the gods of your bluest days / And I'm just getting color back into my face / I’m just mad as hell cause I loved this place.”
The poignant lyricism of Swift does not stop at “So Long, London.” She more than exceeds the poetic influence anticipated in an album entitled the “tortured poets” department. Myth and literary influence alike arise in “Peter,” with its Peter Pan metaphor for a youthful love lost to time and distance, “The Albatross” with its titular homage to Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “The Rime of the Ancient Mariner,” and the undercurrents of “The Black Dog” as a symbol of death and not only the name of a bar.
The poet is often a reader first, and the fiction lover can find solace in Swift’s “rose golden glows” viewed in “I Look in People’s Windows” and the escapism of “I Hate It Here” where one can flee to “secret gardens” in the mind that “people need a key to get to.” The thread of fantasy and escapism woven throughout TTPD softens the blow of its harsher realities—one particularly sharp example of this being the reference to “death rattle breathing” in “How Did It End?” The darkest of poetry has found a release in Swift’s latest album, a therapeutic release of emotion from the songwriter and into listeners. There is a sense of being understood when one truly listens to Swift’s lyrics.
There are some purely lighter elements to the TTPD album that must be noted as well, such as the trending “Down Bad” with its humorous depiction of “crying at the gym,” the infectious energy of “FLORIDA!!!” featuring Florence + The Machine and the thinly-disguised diss track towards Kim Kardashian that is “ThanK u aIMee.” There is also a positivity to Swift’s complete and utter self-awareness conveyed through her songwriting. Even when creating fiction in her lyrics, Swift always alludes to elements of truth. There is an honesty to the falling apart that occurs piece by piece in “My Boy Only Breaks His Favorite Toys” and there is a coyness to lines like “I think some things I never say / Like, "Who uses typewriters anyway?" from the song quite recognizably entitled “The Tortured Poets Department.”
Social media has displayed a connection between fans of Swift and of Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women, and this album has sealed that connection with such songs as “The Bolter” and “The Prophecy.” The minutiae of womanhood and identity is unraveled in the image of the elusive woman in “The Bolter,” the lonely heart in “The Prophecy,” the girl blinded by love in “But Daddy I Love Him,” and the woman reclaiming her power in “Who’s Afraid of Little Old Me?” and “The Smallest Man Who Ever Lived.”
Taylor Swift is at the peak of her career, for now. I have no doubt that she will continue to outdo herself. As Swift has resumed her Eras Tour celebrating her many years of music, it has now evolved into including a TTPD set. This latest set is vibrant with a sense of whimsy and showmanship, adding a fresh dose of magic to her already iconic performances.
​
- Schuyler Becker
CSU Stanislaus

Snipe Hunter
by Tyler Childers, 2025
Tyler Childers, Kentucky native and son of a coal miner, has become an American country music icon throughout his nearly two decades as a performing artist. With his debut album, Bottles and Bibles, releasing in 2011, Childers has since built an impressive discography of beloved classics, including “Feathered Indians,” “All Your’n,” “Shake the Frost,” and his unreleased song, “Jersey Giant,” which has taken on a life of its own. Listeners last heard from Childers in 2023 with his honky-tonk, gospel-inspired album, Rustin’ In The Rain. Now, the Grammy-nominated singer-songwriter has returned to the country music scene with his latest release, Snipe Hunter.
​
Snipe Hunter is composed of 13 tracks, and playfully taps into a gritty, rock-and-roll influence Childers has not previously experimented with. Though certain tracks retain the soulful, folky sound he is known for, Snipe Hunter is an experimentative album that intentionally deviates from his Appalachian roots to allow Childers the space to explore who he is in his sobriety on his own terms.
​
Though his previous albums, Long Violent History (2020) and Can I Take My Hounds to Heaven? (2022), have thematically been about Childers’ sobriety journey, Snipe Hunter feels like an album that is able to touch on the topic without being overwhelmed by it. The opening track, “Eatin’ Big Time,” kicks off a funky, bombastic beat that Childers wails against. His gritty vocals add an extra layer of tongue-in-cheek humor to the lyrics that describe what it feels like to “have made it.” In one lyric, he refers to his Weiss watch before affirming, “Ya goddamn right I’m flexing / Cause a thousand-dollar watch is fine enough flex for me.” Childers makes clear that rather than an assortment of material objects, his measure of success for “eatin’ big time” is the feeling of gratitude he has for being to share his successes with those around him.
​
The third track on the album, “Oneida,” is a studio track that fans have been fervently anticipating since its first performance in 2016. Sonically, the song is reminiscent of one of Childers’ earlier albums, Purgatory (2017), which hosts several love songs including “Lady May” and the beloved, “Feathered Indians.” His vocals are clear, allowing for a rush of genuine emotion through the last chorus and final lines. Though the track starts a bit stripped-back, it quickly crescendos into a full band that imitates the feeling of falling deeply into intimate love. This song quickly broke into Childers’ most popular list on Spotify–and for good reason. Childers has perfected the country love song, and “Oneida” has become one of my personal favorites.
​
However, this album is not just a recycled list of Childers’ staples. Snipe Hunter is characterized by its underlying sense of humor, demonstrating that Childers isn’t afraid to have fun with his music, even when he is writing about more serious topics. “Down Under” is perhaps the most sonically playful track on the album, as its electric-guitar riffs and drum beat set an upbeat and vibrant tone for a song that contemplates themes such as drug use. Using the untamed Australian Outback as the song’s setting, Childers considers how it’s been “forever and a day” since he’s been “down under,” or in active substance abuse. Though the Outback is a place of exploration and excitement, it is also a sector of danger and self-destruction if one is not careful. Though Childers refers to being “down under” as thrilling and heart-racing, he asserts soberly that, “I would not take a thing / From my journey out under.” The track is a masterclass in songwriting and lyricism, as Childers shares the raw and painful details of addiction through the symbolic vessel of koalas and kangaroos.
​
Ultimately, I would rate this album a solid 7/10. Some of Childers’ artistic decisions fall a bit flat for me, such as the intentional warbling of his voice on tracks like “Tirtha Yatra.” I would recommend Snipe Hunter to a more seasoned listener of country, as this album’s variety of sounds and topics may not provide the best first impression for somebody breaking into the genre. However, I would implore nay-sayers to return back to the album for a second listen, as I think the more experimental tracks grow on you once the initial shock wears off. Though I was initially hoping for something a little more folky, Childers himself is so self-assured throughout this album that I cannot help but applaud his authenticity and sense of humor.
​
-Reagan Oliveira
CSU Stanislaus
Book Reviews

Insatiable: My Hunger for Life
by Shobhaa Dé. Harper Collins, 2023.
Insatiable: My Hunger for Life (2023) is an autobiography by Shobhaa De, the leading socialite from India. As the title of the book suggests, De writes of her life made of complex emotions, travels, food and experiences. De describes her life among the elite. But, her descriptions shadow class, caste and gender differences. She offers no representation to the subaltern.
This is the second time I am reviewing a food story. Earlier, I reviewed the food story by Madhushree Ghosh that came out in 2022. Both the books discuss Jaipur, and were part of discussions at the Jaipur Literature Festival in 2023. Is it possible to write a food story when you are a vegetarian only? The way these two books describe meat-eating seems to convey that non-vegetarian food varieties connect the populace and speak to their sentiments. It's just such a voluptuous way of representing food.
While leafing through her memoir, one tends to read nothing of the prevalent discriminations in Indian society. She exhibits a high self-worth. When the preface opens, she is shown worried about the change of her name when she was a child. She is totally unconcerned with the challenges faced by people. It's better to talk about that Shobhaa! She shows no sympathy for the injustices against women, environment or the world in general. She cries when her self-worth is hurt. She has no tears to shed for underprivileged people. The narrative shows no philanthropic gesture on her part. She agrees to pay a lump sum amount to the astrologer because the horoscope is related to her.
I like the cosmopolitan anchor in Insatiable. De has domestic help from various regionalities, and she appreciates food from various places all over the world. This turns out to be a memoir by a privileged woman who has access to places, things and food she likes. Dometic help is a call away, there are people to guide her with eateries, she has money to dispense with for reading out her horoscope.
Half the time, she looks bothered arranging house help. She is ready to disburse any amount of money for that, and this is done in a way to show that it is actually the maids who are materialistic and self-seeking in nature. Insatiable leaves a deep impression on the reader’s mind but owing to the privilege of the lady. Personally, while reading the memoir, I was feeling exhausted at my own class position. I was comparing my material means with that of De. This actually made me love my family even more. I deliberated that this woman is happy when she gets what she loves, she undergoes mood swings owing to that so I must be happy to have a family which I love.
I was exposed to vulnerabilities, class and gender after reading her. The way she structures her book, its form and presentation says that this is a book by no ordinary woman. Here is a woman, who gets to eat with the Nobel Laureates, and Amitav Ghosh, and Aamir Khan. She is recklessly open-minded, and unhesitant in mentioning the good things such as kinnow which we import from Pakistan. She also shows no qualms in commenting on body. There is an entire discussion on breasts which preoccupy her imagination. She freely talks about sex and pleasure. Her husband is her biggest devotee. He likes to celebrate both minor and major events of his life with De.
Family ties are an indestructible part of De’s life. Her daughters take care of her, and she also dotes on them, including her son. Somewhere or the other, I believe food keeps her appetite for sex alive. When she is on a journey to celebrate her wedding anniversary, she has great food. Her privilege comes across in the very form of the text. She adjusts drawings before each chapter.
So, here is a septuagenarian woman who, as the book shows, faced no struggles in her life. She has lived among the riches for so long, and this accounts for her insatiable craving. She wants wealth, wealth and wealth. She wants to be immersed in it.
- Dolly Sharma
JECRC University, Jaipur

Periodic Boyfriends
by Drew Pisarra. Capturing Fire Press, 2023.
The poetry book Periodic Boyfriends by Drew Pisarra was released on May 2, 2023. This collection of poetry uses titles that provoke chemical components in order to provide a raw yet polished and unapologetic expression of experiences. The short poems are rife with intense imagery, placing the reader intimately into these situations. The work is sexual and heady, but brings much more than that to the table the deeper one reads.
Reading poems such as “Bismuth” where Pisarra places an emphasis on a fixation on the things people find the most illicit and what that brings out in those who perceive it. His final lines of “Stein's novel is cryptic… detective fiction minus the killer;/ my old tale’s no clearer than white Mylar,/ erotica sans modernist filler./ Murder’s hard to stomach. Condoms get soiled./ Lurid verse mixes the blue with hard-boiled.”exemplifies what his work in this series does perfectly. Pisarra uses an in depth exposure to experiences that often lie in the shadows, either by intention or force and brings it to the forefront of the mind of the reader.
Along with these aspects, Pisarra amplifies the mark that certain sexual and or intimate experiences leave on a person no matter how short an encounter it may be. Every aspect of this book acknowledges a sense of imprint whether it be from drugs, alcohol, hate-sex, interacting with one who wants to participate, but is terrified of being viewed as “truly” gay. He delves into fear, denial, and his own ability of personal acceptance of what has made him, him.
In that sense, the titles evoking the elements of the periodic table amplify that mindset, acknowledging the small and large factors that remain present whether they are truly seen or even want to be. There is so much behind the scenes of a person that is significant in some way to who they are and become, that Pisarra’s method of writing essentially forces the reader to see that. The vulnerability in writing in the way that he does allows for readers to possess an even deeper understanding of and connection to the work, with or without similar life experiences.
Personally, I love that he closes out the book with the poem “Lawrencium” consisting of phrases such as “The Categorical Imperative/ of Sex Apps heretofore also known as/ Bitch, Pick a Team.” and finally, “In matters of Gender,/ Race, Lustful Preference, and Body Type/ you be you. We’ll figure out where you fit.” These comments are a sensation that many people including myself have felt in needing to check off a box to be seen as valid. The idea of an overseeing body determining where one fits often lurks in the back of the mind of members of the queer community. A book like this existing in the current climate offers a sense that the described sensation spreads further than one often believes, and you do have a place even amongst a society that does not want you to. It offers a feeling of terrifying hope, and is a poetry book I would absolutely recommend.
- Essence Saunders
CSU Stanislaus

The Israeli
by Phillip Kurata, 2025.
The Israeli-–More Than Just a New Classic Spy Novel
​
Perhaps author Phillip Kurata’s greatest asset is his mastery of the element of surprise. This ability reveals itself in his new novel, The Israeli, whose plot twists are unpredictable. In a nutshell, to paraphrase the song from Nat King Cole and Natalie Cole, the book “is unforgettable.”
​
The Israeli, based loosely on the true story of a spy for Israel, Eli Cohen, takes the reader through a hair-raising ride through Egypt, Israel, and Syria, among other places. The book is 506 pages long–and it is long. It’s full of minute details about the early life of Cohen in Egypt and how he was eventually assigned to spy for Israel against its bitter enemies in the Middle East.
​
Because of its length, the novel is reminiscent of Leo Tolstoy’s 1,174-page opus, War and Peace. When War and Peace was about to be published, Tolstoy suddenly remembered, as reported by the Washington Post, “The yacht race! I forgot to put in the yacht race!”​ That kind of oversight simply doesn't happen with The Israeli. In this book, Kurata doesn’t appear to leave anything out. Like a Russian novel, where the reader is quickly introduced to innumerable characters, you have to remember at first who’s doing what with who.
​
One of the novel’s surprising twists is that Cohen, while working undercover in Syria, becomes great friends with those he’s asked to spy on, almost to the point where he’s more comfortable with them than with his own countrymen in Israel. The novel utilizes Cohen’s moral dilemma to tease out how blind allegiance and misunderstanding of others leads to destruction.
​
One notable feature of the book is the author’s intimate knowledge of Middle Eastern mores and customs, having lived and worked in the region for a number of years. Though the action takes place in the 1960s, it feels as contemporary to today's ongoing tensions in the Middle East. Finding a lasting solution amenable to all factions in the region remains a work in progress.
​
Without giving away the plot, as you continue reading through the book, the tension gradually begins to mount. The reader begins to wonder–will Eli Cohen’s real identity be unmasked? You root for him and his wife, hoping their new family will be able to remain safe. However, as the stakes continue to rise, your concern of what will happen to him if his spy role is exposed also grows.
​
The only reservations this reader might have about the novel is its slow start. It might try your patience. However, if you stick with it through the formidable early chapters, you are rewarded for doing so. The tension builds to the point you viscerally feel it in your own body. If only for concerns about my rising blood pressure, I sometimes had to take a five-minute break from the book to calm down. I was almost afraid of what was going to happen next. As they say, this novel is truly a page-turner.
​
I rate the book a 4.8 on a scale of 5. Not a perfect 5, only because you have to wade through the book’s aforementioned complicated and detailed beginning. However, while The Israeli is based on ancient mutual tribal hostilities between Arabs and Jews, it maintains a sense of universality that questions why and how enemies around the world have learned to hate each other. Kurata’s novel traces the source of the Arab-Israeli divide and considers whether that hate can ever be healed. It’s a story you can’t easily forget about, even if you wanted to erase it from your memory banks. For this reader, that was the real surprise about The Israeli.
​
-Eric Green
Movie Reviews

Sinners
Directed by Ryan Coogler, 2025.
The “indie-to-mainstream” pipeline is a path most new directors take when first attempting to break into the film industry. So too was the case for Ryan Coogler, who made his start with the little-known film Fruitvale Station (2013), starring Micheal B. Jordan. It’s one of my personal favorites, as the film documents the final day of a young Oakland, California resident before he is gunned down on New Year’s Day, 2009.
​
By all metrics, the film put Coogler on the map, and his later success as the director of Creed (2015) landed him the opportunity to direct Marvel Studios’ Black Panther (2018). Taking the world by storm alongside the late Chadwick Boseman and his reoccurring “good luck charm,” Micheal B. Jordan, Coogler set his sights on following in the footsteps of the many great horror films he grew up loving as an avid film fan.
​
While the film industry has no shortage of auteurs in the horror genre, Ryan Coogler’s Sinners (2025) demonstrates he’s capable of blending comedy, music, horror, and action all together. If that sounds intriguing to you–that’s the point. Coogler has no interest in appealing to traditional film expectations during the runtime of his new blockbuster. This is ultimately Sinners’ greatest strength, as no audience member can fully guess the intentions of the film or its director before having taken in the entire experience.
Sinners is a rare sort of film that experiments with different genres, adapting well to the confines of the story in the on-screen world. Micheal B. Jordan plays dandy gangster, Smoke, and his twin brother, Stack, as they attempt to open a juke joint club in their old southern hometown during the Jim Crow Era. The film’s opening makes it tempting to view the experience as a historical comedy, following the twins as they spend their day from sunrise to sundown gathering liquor, property, and a staff to run their club. If there’s one thing Sinners prioritizes, it’s making sure that every character is extremely likable and written to perfection. As such, we spend most of our time in the first half falling in love with these notoriously funny and intriguing gangsters as they gallivant throughout town, interacting with equally interesting supporting characters. Learning about their pasts through segmented dialogue and careful direction allows audience members to continually raise questions while others are consistently answered. By the one hour mark, I was hooked by the impressive filmmaking and incredible writing, but it wasn’t until I reached the second half of the film that my expectations were pleasantly exceeded.
​
Around the middle of Sinners, its themes of harmony through music, racial community, and the weight of one’s sins took a complete 180. As Smoke and Stack’s Juke Joint hosts its grand opening, a group of Irish vampires come to crash the party. What’s almost shocking as the film’s transition from comedy to horror is the fact that it works supremely well in the film's favor. Just as it seems there will be a gratifying end to their long day, our characters find themselves set against insurmountable odds and a supernatural enemy. While the twist seems abrupt, through some tense direction and methodically-paced scenes, it somehow doesn’t feel disjointed at all.
​
For fans of vampire culture, Sinners is really a dream film that ensures all areas of the creature mythology are maintained and played off of. As someone who is consistently annoyed at the film industry’s embarrassment to embrace the goofy side of the iconic creature, I was pleased to see Coogler adopt these concepts as he wrote his night-stalkers. The vampires maintain an aura of charm and intelligence whilst being forced to conform to the classic ruleset of the creature. That translates to no entering a property unless they’re invited in or roaming free while the sun is out. And yes, garlic and wood stakes are their end-all-be-all weaknesses. Personally, I found the film’s dedication to the rules ridiculously campy and fun, as it allowed me to really enjoy the inclusion of these creatures in the second half of the film.
​
As I walked out of the theatre, I was shocked and impressed that Ryan Coogler had managed to take so many risks and have them pay off in a satisfying and memorable way. Sinners is the type of film I always champion in my reviews and critiques. It’s the kind of piece that longs to be remembered and strives to be enjoyable. It takes risks and lives and breathes passion through every line of dialogue and camera shot. Similar to Jordan Peele’s Get Out (2017) and Ari Aster’s Hereditary (2018), Sinners is a film that I think will remain in audience members' minds for years to come, longing to be rewatched and dissected.
​
- Julian Saenz-Payne
CSU Stanislaus

Superman
Directed by James Gunn, 2025.
Despite being the most famous superhero of all time, Superman has had anything but a consistent public image over the last 10 years. While general audiences typically fawn over live-action superhero films, much of the public’s opinion of these iconic characters are based solely on how they are perceived on the big screen. For Superman, the last 10 years have been rough. Man of Steel (2013), the most recent Superman film, portrayed a dramatic adventure starring Henry Cavill. The film controversially shook the core foundation of the beloved hero, painting him as a stoic, tragic, and Christ-like figure. However, the public perception of Superman has changed dramatically since then.
​
Enter James Gunn, decorated director and DC Studios’ new co-CEO. After taking the world by storm with Marvel Studios’ Guardians Of The Galaxy (2014), it became apparent that Gunn was not just a man capable of shaping comics into feature films–he was also somebody who cared deeply about staying true to those comics’ origins and values. This commitment to authenticity is necessary, especially considering that many audience members, including myself, have seen the writing on the wall for a while now. The term “superhero fatigue” follows big-budget studios like a looming shadow. In a time marked by incredible cynicism and uncertainty for the capes on screen, Gunn was able to do something with Superman (2025) that no studio has done in years–create a heartwarming summer blockbuster that reinvents and brings new life to a timeless character who has spent too long in the shadows of less-deserving heroes.
​
Superman, starring David Corenswet, is reminiscent of a time when films stood on their own. They once inspired audiences and manifested emotion from their passionate productions, a sentiment that DC Studios has desperately lacked as of late. Superman doesn’t succeed because it has 70 A and B-list actors. Superman doesn’t succeed because it has a $500 million budget. Superman succeeds because–above all else–James Gunn prioritized making a film with heart. Certainly, the film aims to inspire and change as many lives as possible with its extremely optimistic and timeless narrative. While Superman is certainly flawed and takes many missteps in its first act, it makes up for it on multiple fronts. Excellent casting, down-to-earth dialogue, and a larger than life camera crew lifts the film off the shoulders of mediocrity. To be frank, like most big-budget blockbusters, the film could be better. However, it’s really difficult to hold a grudge against such a hopeful movie about an iconic hero up against the odds. It has positivity baked into its very DNA, and it’s extremely hard to see those credits roll and not smile.
​
The future for superhero films remains uncertain, though both Marvel Studios and DC Studios are seemingly cognizant of the public’s cynicism towards their films. Despite being self-aware, a course-correction seems almost impossible for studios as large and important as the aforementioned heavy-hitters. Truthfully, though the studio might be hesitant to admit it, the induction of James Gunn as the co-head of DC Studios seems to have saved them from their fate of obscurity. While there is certainly room for the seasoned director to improve, at least die-hard fans know where they stand under Gunn’s leadership. They know they have someone in their corner that comes from their walk of life. James Gunn is not just a director; he’s somebody who can see past the numbers and corporate expectations and make a damn good movie. He’s somebody who wants to change lives and not just empty audiences’ pockets 4 times a year–and most importantly–he’s somebody who cares.
​
As a born-cynic and often harsh critic of the mediocre, I found a tough time writing about Superman. At times, the film comes together as a Frankenstein’s monster of ideas and messages, loosely held together by some impressive visuals and emotional moments; at others, it’s all an audience member could want. As someone who’s been going to the movies my entire life, nothing quite struck me as the light in my 11-year-old brother’s eyes when he saw Superman save Metropolis on opening day. There was something about that moment that stuck with me. While there are certainly better films to see and discuss, nothing comes quite close to the experience of seeing Superman in theaters. For me, it broke a near indestructible shield of pessimism, instead replacing it with a warm blanket of hope for a future where superheroes can help inspire and form a new generation of movie-goers.
​
- Julian Saenz-Payne
CSU Stanislaus
Television Reviews

The Fall of the House of Usher
Created by Mike Flanagan, 2023
What do Gothic horror and capitalism have in common? Mike Flanagan explores this in his final contracted Netflix show, The Fall of the House of Usher, which aired in October 2023.
​
The show is the third in a series of modern retellings of classic Gothic horror novels, which includes The Haunting of Hill House (based on the novel of the same name by Shirley Jackson) and The Haunting of Bly Manor (based on Henry James’s The Turn of the Screw). Like its predecessors, The Fall of the House of Usher feels both familiar and fresh, filled with Easter eggs for those who know the source material, while remaining accessible and gripping for those who don’t.
​
Unlike the other two, however, The Fall of the House of Usher takes inspiration from multiple works, all from the literary canon of Edgar Allan Poe. The framing device of the show is based on the short story of the same name, where an ailing Roderick Usher recounts the downfall of his family to a nameless narrator, in this case, reimagined as the attorney Auguste Dupin.
​
In this version of the story, Roderick is the CEO of a multimillion-dollar pharmaceutical company called Fortunato, which he built alongside his ruthless, brilliant sister Madeline, and which is currently under trial. Roderick has six children from five different women, all equally spoilt and greedy: weak-willed heir Frederick, entrepreneur Tamerlane, surgeon Victorine, spin doctor Camille, video game developer Napoleon, and hedonistic party boy Prospero.
​
Through a series of horrific and seemingly coincidental accidents, the Usher siblings all begin dying in gruesome ways. This isn’t a spoiler — the show opens with their funerals and the newspaper headlines reporting their deaths. The mystery isn’t what happened to them, but why. The answer is revealed to us slowly and cleverly, through Roderick’s confession to Dupin in the dilapidated ruins of his childhood home, woven with flashbacks to how he and Madeline clawed their way out of poverty and took over Fortunato. Threaded throughout the narrative is the spectre of a mysterious woman called Verna who appears to be haunting — and hunting — the family.
​
This reimagining of the Ushers running a corrupt pharmaceutical empire that peddles an addictive drug called Ligodone calls to mind the real-life Sackler family, who were responsible for the OxyContin epidemic. Through this, the show explores the evils of capitalism and wealth. The Ushers’ greed and their conviction that their money makes them untouchable becomes the crux of their downfall — and also makes it satisfyingly cathartic to watch. “I reached through time and ripped the eyes out of a goddess with my pocketbook and some patience,” Roderick muses, showing off a pair of sapphires he smuggled out of Egypt. “Does that make me a god?”(Episode 06: “Goldbug”)
​
Not only do these themes evoke a modern horror beyond otherworldly entities and blood-splattered ghosts, but they also feel startlingly relevant to Poe’s works — where human evil and sin sometimes take monstrous forms, and characters find themselves punished in painful and karmic ways. Verna, whose true nature is never revealed, describes herself as ‘consequence’, and appears before each Usher’s death to offer them a way out, setting her up as the spectre of karmic justice.
​
In keeping with the Gothic tradition, the show relies heavily on a sense of dread to evoke horror — the knowledge of the deaths to come leaves viewers in a constant state of nervous anticipation. The deaths themselves are almost poetically grotesque, with Prospero’s being the most nauseating. In true Flanagan form, we also have the occasional jump scares, in the form of blood-splattered corpses that appear to Roderick as he relays his story. Interplayed with this is some beautifully macabre cinematography, which creates a dark, moody atmosphere that feels very Poe.
​
As a reader of Poe, I loved how the show was peppered with many sly nods to his works. Each episode title references a different short story and therefore hints at how each sibling will die. Each character shares a name with one of Poe’s characters, from Roderick’s tragic first wife Annabel Lee to Dupin, whose named after Poe’s iconic detective. Fortunato references a character in The Cask of Amontillado and The Gold-Bug. Tamerlane’s wellness start-up references The Gold-Bug, where the narrator becomes fixated on a golden bug that he sees as the key to his fortune. The word ‘nevermore’, evoking Poe’s most famous poem, The Raven, who becomes a character in her own right, is repeated throughout the last episode. Themes and motifs that recur in Poe’s works pop up throughout, such as the idea of being buried alive. These careful details and the amount of research that went into them ultimately make the show feel like a love letter to Poe while standing in its own right as a modern story.
​
The Usher family — with the exception of the only granddaughter Lenore, Frederick’s ill-fated wife Morella, and Roderick’s young second wife Juno — are all morally repugnant and entirely detestable, but with an outrageous lack of self-awareness that borders on the comical. An unexpected show-stealer was Mark Hamill’s Arthur Pym, the Ushers’ fixer, nicknamed the Pym Reaper for his willingness to get blood on his hands, who remains grim-faced and unfazed even as he confronts the supernatural. Verna, or the Raven, played by Carla Gugino, dominates every scene she is in — terrifyingly otherworldly, even in her mannerisms, alternating between playful and vindictive. The ambiguity of what she is, and what motivates her, makes her all the more sinister.
​
But despite that, the real evil at the heart of the show is not Verna, or the supernatural, but humanity itself. “We’re a virus, I think,” Pym reflects (Episode 08: “The Raven”). The monstrous becomes an allegory for the corruption that exists in the mundane, and that is what makes The Fall of the House of Usher truly a horror story.
​
- Shehrazade Zafar-Arif

The Sympathizer
Created by Park Chan-wook and Don McKellar, 2024
While it is perhaps a touch redundant to write that the 1970s was a politically turbulent period, it is difficult to stress how truly divisive the Vietnam War was for the United States. The country’s deep involvement in Vietnam to quell the oncoming surge of communism caused many Americans to question their allegiances and test the strength of their principles. Caught in the crossfire of one of America’s greatest moral qualms, The Sympathizer is told from the perspective of a Northern Vietnamese war spy who simultaneously believes in Communism and regrets the events that must take place to achieve his mission. Twisting, turning, and cleverly sardonic, the Max dramatic miniseries utilizes the inherently deceitful world of spycraft to explore the many, sometimes contrasting, allegiances one man may hold.
​
Based on Viet Thanh Nguyen’s 2015 novel, the television adaptation follows “Captain,” played by Hoa Xuande, a mole in the Southern Vietnamese Army. His absence of a name is intentional, emphasizing how his value resides in his ability to serve the Communist Party. However, this simultaneously suggests a lack of personal identity, as the Captain struggles not only with his split loyalties, but the racism surrounding his mixed-race heritage. While rejection is a common theme of the Captain’s life, he does not regret the ostracism it has caused him. Rather, his social exclusion shapes a well-rounded worldview that eventually opposes the stringent beliefs of the Communist Party and leads to his imprisonment. His turbulent experiences and morally gray actions throughout the war as a refugee, spy, and dangerous assassin allow directors Park Chan-wook, Fernando Meirelles, and Marc Munden to further unpack Nguyen’s critical themes such as personal identity, American ignorance and intervention, and the tenacious relationship between loyalty to one's country and oneself.
With the events of the Captain’s capture beginning four months prior to the Fall of Saigon, the story is told through a stream of consciousness, manifested from his confession written from the barracks of an unidentified re-education camp awaiting his sentence after Communist occupation of the country. Although the format of the show allows very little secrecy between the viewer and the Captain himself, the details of his life are hazy and confused. As a man whose livelihood depends on his duplicity, forever suspended between worlds and identities, the Captain’s confession reveals not only a newfound dichotomy between his allegiances, but a full repression of painful memories he cannot bring himself to admit yet must be extracted to ensure his survival.
One of these memories occurs shortly before the Fall of Saigon, when the true movers and shakers of the Southern Vietnamese Army are introduced–the General and American CIA agent Claude, played by Toan Lee and Robert Downey Jr. The men bear witness to the shakedown of an alleged Northern Vietnamese spy, of whom the Captain was her primary informant. Despite the torture she undergoes, she refuses to give up the name of the Captain, who feels both helplessness and shame, knowing he should be just as willing to lay down his life for this cause. The event plagues him, as do several other atrocities and deaths he feels culpable for, all of which come back in the form of ghosts to haunt him. Though he feels great responsibility to liberate his beloved Vietnam from American occupation, the Captain cannot help but feel torn between his mission and those that he loves.
The Captain’s game of emotional tug-of-war depicts not only the complexity of the Vietnam War itself, but also the experience of the Vietnamese refugee and immigrant in a less than tolerant country. While the racism the Captain and the other characters experience is not necessarily violent, it is pointed and direct. When the Captain enters a small gas station shop, inquiring after rice starch, he is met with a sneered response that all America offers, and tolerates, is cornstarch. However, rather than being defeated by America’s ignorance and racist attitudes, the Captain exploits it, using the cornstarch to secretly communicate with his handler and receive his missions. The Sympathizer shifts the power dynamic through the constant underestimation of the Captain, capitalizing off the racist misconceptions so many held towards the Vietnamese at the time.
​
Still, the United States, for all its culpability and flaws, affords the Captain and his fellow countrymen opportunity in ways they could not have dreamed: movie roles, successful restaurants, and music careers. Despite his better judgment, the Captain finds himself appreciating the very country which he has sworn to destroy. The ultimate success of the series is its ability to force audiences to question their own allegiances and to consider how and why their own values have been formed. The complicated nature of The Sympathizer considers the possibility of not duplicity in each of us, but complexity-all against the backdrop of one of the 1970s most controversial historical events.
- Reagan Oliveira
CSU Stanislaus